Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 03:09:17 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de> Cc: bde@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Implementation errors in strtol() Message-ID: <20050121000916.GA73235@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050120222137.GE30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <20050120192324.GA30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050120205501.GA69123@nagual.pp.ru> <20050120211449.GC30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050120214406.GA70088@nagual.pp.ru> <20050120222137.GE30862@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 11:21:37PM +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote: > As Andrey Chernov wrote: > > > Errno may be set in case of error with not documented errno. Thats > > how I read it, but I may miss something. > > I read that a bit differently. People please, I want to make it clear, personally I not from POSIX commitee. If you disagree with POSIX, please discuss it on their forums, not with me. All I can is to make some loosely assumptions about their logic. If you disagree that FreeBSD must follow POSIX (as united and superseded things among all several other standards related to the subject), this should be CORE decision. Because in the past POSIX word was final thing for FreeBSD implemetations, not C, not SUS. -- http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050121000916.GA73235>