From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 13 20:31:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5820716A4EC for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maxsec@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2089A43E34 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:22:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxsec@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1042042uge for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:22:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=B5UcvgkZ+B3cTD+GYWakKZjQvsY/ukWxEjebA244wXNvmI93O43R4TjXDcI6umRNpx/Ou6vTTkCKRwBXaGSH84PdbniCD8kojG64/vlVnaWAOEa6eJ2GwKS+ZaZ74uQGa6iThvWxucpNABmUcpFTGR//cpmHyOej9g6l1e1DJGo= Received: by 10.78.117.10 with SMTP id p10mr76246huc.1163449334245; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:22:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.142.19 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:22:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <72cf361e0611131222n6d6a9001iaea9fe04e41eeb88@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:22:14 +0000 From: "Martin Hepworth" To: Brian In-Reply-To: <4557C3A0.7050203@sonicboom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4557C3A0.7050203@sonicboom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: image based stock spam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:31:06 -0000 Brian the SARE Stock rules (and others) from www.rulesemporium.com are equally good at catching this stuff, and a lot lot lighter on CPU cycles. -- Martin On 11/13/06, Brian wrote: > > Looks like the preferred approach many folks re the above problem is > fuzzyocr? Since there isn't a port for that, is there another FreeBSD > solution worth mentioning here? > > Brian > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >