Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:05:11 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: John Baldwin <john@baldwin.cx> Cc: Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@tanimura.dyndns.org> Subject: Re: Is MTX_CONTESTED evil? Message-ID: <xzplllrtjm0.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200403221906.47238.john@baldwin.cx> (John Baldwin's message of "Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:06:47 -0500") References: <200403160519.i2G5J0V6023193@urban> <200403220657.i2M6vCrS097750@shojaku.t.axe-inc.co.jp> <20040322234557.GA7661@VARK.homeunix.com> <200403221906.47238.john@baldwin.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin <john@baldwin.cx> writes: > Adaptive mutexes work just fine, but they aren't on by default. No, they don't "work just fine", unless of course they are *supposed* to cause frequent panics. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzplllrtjm0.fsf>