From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 26 11:47:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA14101 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 11:47:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from shrimp.dataplex.net (shrimp.dataplex.net [208.2.87.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA14095 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 11:47:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rkw@Dataplex.NET) From: rkw@Dataplex.NET Received: from dataplex.net (nomad.dataplex.net [208.2.87.8]) by shrimp.dataplex.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA19664; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 18:05:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rkw@dataplex.net) Message-Id: <199810270005.SAA19664@shrimp.dataplex.net> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 13:46:27 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: CTM Release Generation - (Re: Stable and CTM) To: andrew@sour.cream.org cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19981026190118.007ac480@ice.cream.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 26 Oct, Andrew Boothman wrote: > Surely a FreeBSD.org host has a bit of slack space that could be used for > something like this? Can anybody comment? Actually, they abandoned CTM some years ago because of the lack of those resources. I carried it on for a couple years, and now Mark has taken over to chores. I assure you that the resources required anr NOT insignificant. It eats up a lot of disk space, I/O time and CPU time. None of those have come from freebsd.org in quite some time. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message