Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:18:02 +0400 From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: Paolo Bormida <pbormida@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: amule-10275 Message-ID: <86hbgi4mv9.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikaAsKKYAKVi15AFCMy0gNYRDuZ785pOTpv6K3p@mail.gmail.com> (Paolo Bormida's message of "Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:06:28 %2B0200") References: <AANLkTinNPgm5pJS-OY28t5fScwtv%2BKHg-rXeBMqJd9Ht@mail.gmail.com> <86tylij8pu.fsf@gmail.com> <AANLkTik_xfuhgrZ1%2BHyGkB7UJEq5qWdvtGx3tK%2BuAiha@mail.gmail.com> <86tylh7uxv.fsf@gmail.com> <86d3s57ult.fsf@gmail.com> <AANLkTikibbYCV9Vig63xaH2GVwY9OgxE6g=45CZHHPrV@mail.gmail.com> <86vd5x3hed.fsf@gmail.com> <AANLkTikOuNZtYCxZdZPbUNxo1_KMJwspFBk93aAK8eCD@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinuJxR3ePqetjsTbcgZ-dnu7d8xjO6ih6BUg_OY@mail.gmail.com> <86tyl732ge.fsf@gmail.com> <AANLkTikaAsKKYAKVi15AFCMy0gNYRDuZ785pOTpv6K3p@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paolo Bormida <pbormida@gmail.com> writes: > 2010/9/30 Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> >> In such cases there are usually two ports, e.g. >> >> net-p2p/amule (latest release) >> net-p2p/amule-devel (svn snapshot) >> >> Now, if you're willing to maintain non-devel port I can write you a diff >> and request my pending repocopy in ports/150985 to include amule-devel. >> > > Haven't thought about that, but yes, usually two ports are used, one to > track the development branch of an app and the other for releases. The split is done. It was smooth thanks to pgollucci. There are not many changes between the ports, see $ cd /usr/ports $ diff -uprN net-p2p/amule net-p2p/amule-devel Do you have any more issues regarding versions?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86hbgi4mv9.fsf>