Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:09:35 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: karl@akheller.net Cc: mita@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsdb -Uu failure from tkscanfax Message-ID: <20040701180935.GA30043@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200407011705.i61H5Gn11514@darktower.akheller.net> References: <200407011705.i61H5Gn11514@darktower.akheller.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:05:15PM -0400, Karl Heller wrote: >=20 > >From an updated ports tree via cvsup just a few minutes ago... >=20 > portdb -Uu > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..tkscanfa= x-1.02: "/usr/ports/japanese/tk80" non-existent -- dependency list incomple= te > =3D=3D=3D> comms/tkscanfax failed >=20 > Now, granted I don't have /usr/ports/any_language_other_than_english. So = does this mean I don't qualify "(INDEX builds are not supported with partia= l or out-of-date ports collections)." >=20 > I've never had a problem before with other languages being removed and bu= ilding the indexdb. So, why does tkscanfax require the japanese version of= tk80 and not the english? Please: 1) Wrap your lines at 70 characters so that your emails may be easily read 2) Consult the archives for extensive discussion on this topic. Kris --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA5FNfWry0BWjoQKURAkitAJ0RzSAZtYdvFrVs0VwZPwiKASK+6gCg8LMm upwOPnJNDVwufT6K1p9o70I= =jryM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040701180935.GA30043>