Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 17:50:16 GMT From: Timothy Beyer <beyert@cs.ucr.edu> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/166899: update port: audio/libmp3splt Message-ID: <201206071750.q57HoGqd032321@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/166899; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Timothy Beyer <beyert@cs.ucr.edu> To: Anton Yuzhaninov <citrin@citrin.ru> Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, beyert@cs.ucr.edu Subject: Re: ports/166899: update port: audio/libmp3splt Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:49:58 -0700 At Thu, 07 Jun 2012 17:36:21 +0400, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: > > I think generation of doxygen docs should not be enabled in this port. Any way > it should be not enabled by default, as in proposed patch. > > Doxygen doc for libmp3splt is not useful for most freebsd users, who install > this port. Doxygen docs is interesting only for mp3splt and mp3splt-gtk > developers, who unlikely use freebsd port, but probobly build libmp3splt from > svn trank/branches by hands. > > As maintainer I don't approve suggested patch. > > -- > Anton Yuzhaninov > Hi Anton, I agree with you, (and I find it odd that libmp3splt has the docs enabled by default) however, I think it is installing the doxygen docs anyway, they simply are not in the pkg-plist. (for example, on my machine, /usr/local/share/doc/mp3splt-gtk/doxygen/ is populated). I'd recommending adding --disable-doxygen-doc to CONFIGURE_ARGS if that is your desired configuration, since otherwise I think they are being included anyway. Either way, this PR should be closed, since my subsequent PR for the following version was already approved and applied. (eg. see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=168184) Regards, Tim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201206071750.q57HoGqd032321>