Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:25:42 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Alejandro Imass <aimass@yabarana.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Detail in section 25.2.3.3 of the Handbook Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301291612510.32118@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <CAHieY7R_WKGsxXZu85ZXDnfP4v29QRnFmV5vJ%2BZtXyO_cvr0eQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAHieY7R_WKGsxXZu85ZXDnfP4v29QRnFmV5vJ%2BZtXyO_cvr0eQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Alejandro Imass wrote: > Maybe it's intentional but in section > > 25.2.3.3 Rebuilding Ports After a Major Version Upgrade > > The step that says: > > portupgrade -f ruby18-bdb > > Shouldn't it be ruby-bdb without the 18? > > Is there a reason why it has to be ruby18-bdb That's a good point. It should probably be the origin, databases/ruby-bdb. I don't have a way to test that right now. But really, it ought to be rewritten to use ports-mgmt/portmaster to remove the dependency issue entirely. In fact, that could just refer to the upgrade process at the end of the portmaster(8) man page.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1301291612510.32118>