Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 21:32:36 +0200 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: KOT MATPOCKuH <matpockuh@gmail.com> Cc: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: named crashes on assertion in rbtdb.c on sparc64/SMP Message-ID: <20110708193236.GB95673@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <CALmdT0UnAkjNK2MScU8rjMQ%2BieqUtER6FrEwaDCiQ3cynKfBQw@mail.gmail.com> References: <BANLkTi=_PP=tvLUbXiTE1DT4tMirLRUY%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> <20110629134140.GF14797@alchemy.franken.de> <4E0B8F25.7090107@FreeBSD.org> <CALmdT0V2Fzf8mcYRzYzsu5XkauuxGaF4dxFPR7ZHr-FH2a_5bQ@mail.gmail.com> <20110707100446.GJ14797@alchemy.franken.de> <CALmdT0VFC7kBxaEqLuFVWkLk3o2hLe29tsx3dgn17tuTNaTRLA@mail.gmail.com> <20110707154958.GK14797@alchemy.franken.de> <CALmdT0V_MG7abrGyp-JodsP3Bun-C863VGqTkSAdewnFbiA-%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> <20110708181102.GA95673@alchemy.franken.de> <CALmdT0UnAkjNK2MScU8rjMQ%2BieqUtER6FrEwaDCiQ3cynKfBQw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 11:17:20PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote: > 2011/7/8 Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>: > > > Please try the following: > > a) Instead of the base BIND use the dns/bind96 port. The native build > > ? of the latter defaults to not using the ISC atomic implementation > > ? on sparc64 (and arm) and should properly enable the alternative. I > > ? can at least start named from bind96-9.6.3.1.ESV.R4.3 with the default > > ? configuration on -CURRENT without problems. > dns/bind96? Why not bind98? In order to have a result which can be compared with the base BIND. Whether bind98 works or works without the ISC atomic operations says nothing about the bind96 port or the base version. > As I see dns/bind98 configures without atomic swap operations. > I will try to use dns/bind98 at first :) > > > b) Revert the above patch and try the base bind with the following > > ? (third) patch: > > ? http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/sparc64_isc_atomic.h.diff2 > > ? That one adds the memory barriers required for reference counting > > ? albeit in a sledgehammer-like fashion as the ISC atomic API doesn't > > ? allow to distinguish between acquire and release semantics. > > Hmmm... With this patch build fails: Oops, sorry, I forgot to revert the previous patch when test-compiling. Please re-fetch sparc64_isc_atomic.h.diff2 and try again. Marius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110708193236.GB95673>