From owner-freebsd-java Wed May 15 11:23:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.hccnet.nl (smtp.hccnet.nl [62.251.0.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A5837B407; Wed, 15 May 2002 11:23:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from there by smtp.hccnet.nl via uds6-45.dial.hccnet.nl [62.251.45.6] with SMTP id UAA07978 (8.8.8/1.13); Wed, 15 May 2002 20:23:27 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200205151823.UAA07978@smtp.hccnet.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Ernst de Haan Organization: FreeBSD Project To: Jay Sachs Subject: Re: Request for review: Standardising Java library directory locations Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 20:23:16 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200205101311.PAA08481@smtp.hccnet.nl> <3CDBD919.5000308@eziba.com> In-Reply-To: <3CDBD919.5000308@eziba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Jay, > While it will work, it seems unfortunate to use directories with ',' > characters in them (in the case that PORTEPOCH is defined). What > motivates the need to support multiple instances of the same version of > a port differing only by the "port epoch"? Okay, perhaps the PORTEPOCH is not a good idea. You have a point. I will change the proposal for this. Ernst To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message