Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:52:03 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/libvanessa_adt Makefile pkg-plist ports/devel/libvanessa_adt/files patch-ltmain.sh Message-ID: <20040324135025.A88409@qbhto.arg> In-Reply-To: <20040324165038.GB3323@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200403231608.i2NG8XmM046696@repoman.freebsd.org> <40608C18.60103@dougbarton.net> <20040324165038.GB3323@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, David O'Brien wrote:
> Agreed WRT bumping PORTREVISION. Why does it seem almost all ports
> committers today think PORTREVISION must be bumped with ever single
> commit??
Two reasons come immediately to mind. The first is inadequate training
by mentors (which is a self-perpetuating cycle). The second is the well
entrenched human proclivity to twist a knob simply because it exists.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040324135025.A88409>