Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 7 Nov 2001 17:57:51 +0200
From:      Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
To:        David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Should we keep the vim5 port?
Message-ID:  <20011107175751.B8623@straylight.oblivion.bg>
In-Reply-To: <20011107074751.A93028@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@freebsd.org on Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:47:51AM -0800
References:  <20011107074751.A93028@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:47:51AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> Now that Vim 6.0 is out (with most .0 bug fixes); do we still need the
> vim5 port?

I personally think we should keep it a bit longer, for fools like myself
who are wary of bloat and hidden bugs in the new versions :)

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
If I had finished this sentence,

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011107175751.B8623>