Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:37:58 -0800 From: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@BSDforge.com> To: "Jonathan Anderson" <jonathan@FreeBSD.org> Cc: <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, "Benno Rice" <benno@freebsd.org>, <mike@karels.net>, <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>, "Bill Sorenson" <instructionset@gmail.com> Subject: Re: The future of fortune(6) Message-ID: <de84a95f31f22330edc94ed3ddf2af11@udns.ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <C8A9F707-91D4-4B05-A9E4-E85AC86E5985@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 11:50:46 -0330 "Jonathan Anderson" <jonathan@FreeBSD=2Eor= g> said > On 27 Nov 2017, at 1:01, Bill Sorenson wrote: >=20 > > I for one would recommend leaving things alone unless it is a > > substantive improvement=2E >=20 > That's a sound principle, but if we move the datfiles (other than=20 > `freebsd-tips`) into ports, we could take all of the future time we=20 > would otherwise spend debating fortune(6) and use it for=2E=2E=2E anything=20 > else=2E :) I would call that a substantive improvement=2E Following your assertion; if I were to pass a women being violated, knowing my intervention would end it=2E Should I simply pass it by, knowing the time I save would allow me the time to get that cup of coffee I really wanted? If you don't take the necessary time to fight for things you believe in; no matter how insignificant they may seem to others=2E What's the point? --Chris >=20 >=20 > Jon > -- > Jonathan Anderson > jonathan@FreeBSD=2Eorg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?de84a95f31f22330edc94ed3ddf2af11>