Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 8 Aug 2007 07:17:16 -0700
From:      "jdow" <jdow@earthlink.net>
To:        <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Bizzare routing table entry.
Message-ID:  <03ab01c7d9c6$d33cd600$0225a8c0@wednesday>
References:  <64c038660708071210w1950ccccwda1bb8464587d1de@mail.gmail.com> <8cb6106e0708071331v47c866beh2296110c75a846c2@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
From: "Josh Carroll" <josh.carroll@gmail.com>

>> root# route delete 0&0xc0a80132
>>
>>   [1] 37343
>>   route: writing to routing socket: No such process
>>   delete net 0: not in table
>>   0xc0a80132: Command not found.
>>   [1]  + Exit 1                        route delete 0
> 
>> root# route delete 0&0xc0a80132
>>
>>   [1] 37343
>>   route: writing to routing socket: No such process
>>   delete net 0: not in table
>>   0xc0a80132: Command not found.
>>   [1]  + Exit 1                        route delete 0
> 
> I've no idea whether that is a valid route or not, but the reason
> you're getting that funkiness is that the shell is eating the & and
> thinks you are sending the route process to the background. Try:
> 
> route delete '0&0xc0a80132'

There goes 192.168.1.50.

{^_-}    Joanne





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?03ab01c7d9c6$d33cd600$0225a8c0>