From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 00:04:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84B716A420; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 00:04:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19CA43D55; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 00:04:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C400C20B7; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:03:56 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: unavailable X-Spam-Score: -3.1/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59412098; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:03:56 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9BB7033C9E; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:03:56 +0100 (CET) To: Rostislav Krasny References: <59e2ee810512250841t75157e62rec9dc389ac716534@mail.gmail.com> <20051227101621.GA16276@walton.maths.tcd.ie> <86irrfoix5.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060218012029.e146e2ff.rosti.bsd@gmail.com> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:03:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20060218012029.e146e2ff.rosti.bsd@gmail.com> (Rostislav Krasny's message of "Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:20:29 +0200") Message-ID: <86vevdjzwz.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: yar@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org, dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie, mak@ll.mit.edu, MH@kernel32.de Subject: Re: SSH login takes very long time...sometimes X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 00:04:13 -0000 Rostislav Krasny writes: > In conjunction to what David had proposed, what do you think about > decreasing the RES_DFLRETRY from 4 to 2, like in other systems and in > BIND9's resolver? I have no opinion on that matter. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no