From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 24 23:42:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10DBD1065673 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:42:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE478FC1B for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-143-131.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.143.131]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A0E1DEF5; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:42:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id p1ONgJD5004170; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:42:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:42:19 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Gary Gatten Message-Id: <20110225004219.bfbbbd77.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <21929_1298589484_4D66E72C_21929_309_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499BD35499F@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> References: <4D61599E.4040008@gmail.com> <20110224234044.0df661c1.freebsd@edvax.de> <20110224225425.GB13490@guilt.hydra> <20110225001301.e4f6d95f.freebsd@edvax.de> <21929_1298589484_4D66E72C_21929_309_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499BD35499F@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backtick versus $() X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:42:22 -0000 On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:18:03 -0600, Gary Gatten wrote: > Everyone is wrong! "pfmsh" is the best at everything, period. > It does everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow. > It doesn't require any upgrades, ever. It's 100% secure. > It doesn't use any memory or other resources, $hit, it doesn't > even need to be installed; it just "magically" works. > > There you have it. The standard reply to "is better" or "is the best" is "I don't like" followed by any arbitrary attribute, like "but I don't like the color" or "I don't like the file names". :-) Meanwhile, I've looked into mksh and found out that giving it a standard prompt (user@host:path$) is not very easy and involves copying two lines from the manpage (search for PS1) into a config file. It's not that you can use bash's prompt 1:1 (or csh's). Completition and history behaviour is nice, better than bash, in my opinion, and equal to csh (which I prefer in this regards). Oh "prefer" - it's all very individual, that's why the system's default shell should be replaced by punched cards. Everyone likes colorful punched cards. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...