Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:40:10 -0800 From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com Cc: fenner@research.att.com, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: So, AGAIN, why was tcpdump moved? Message-ID: <200003310840.AAA02751@windsor.research.att.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>That said, isn't there some way we could build it twice, once for the >crypto dist and once for the bindist? That would mean that the crypto >distribution copy simply blops over the bin distribution version if >selected and POLA is fully obeyed. Sounds perfectly reasonable to me. I'd be happy if someone else wants to look at this, or I can look at it on the 10th when I get back from Australia. This would mean there's a src/secure/usr.sbin/tcpdump that builds with crypto and src/usr.sbin/tcpdump that builds without? Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003310840.AAA02751>