Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:50:47 +0000 From: Joe Holden <joe@joeholden.co.uk> To: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> Cc: UNIX - Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Totally stumped - very long post Message-ID: <45632057.2080706@joeholden.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <3974ECF15478CC1AAEE19789@utd59514.utdallas.edu> References: <BFE16982B9EB3D6BADF911A8@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> <B0018098-1130-4D89-9774-1B241737D6FD@dpcsys.com> <2A97A175E0A3D7A039D1AA98@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> <456297CE.9030103@joeholden.co.uk> <3974ECF15478CC1AAEE19789@utd59514.utdallas.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On Tuesday, November 21, 2006 06:08:14 +0000 Joe Holden > <joe@joeholden.co.uk> wrote: >>> >>> Here's something odd. If I change the first octet to anything other >>> than 66, the traceroutes run normally. But if I leave the first octet >>> at 66 and change any of the other octets, they all return host is down. >>> I double checked, and the defaultrouter is 66.221.96.1 in /etc/rc.conf. >> Well of course, double check your routing table ;) (hint: second route >> entry) >> > Care to give me a bigger hint? I'm not a routing guru. > > I tried this with no luck: > route delete 66 > route: writing to routing socket: No such process > delete host 66: not in table > > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Senior Information Security Analyst > The University of Texas at Dallas > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ route delete -net 66 should do it
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45632057.2080706>