Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 Sep 2002 09:08:30 -0700
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Jon Mini <mini@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/svr4 svr4_stream.c
Message-ID:  <20020924160830.GA95327@elvis.mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20020924104458.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20020923211121.GL7539@elvis.mu.org> <XFMail.20020924104458.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> [020924 07:45] wrote:
> 
> On 23-Sep-2002 Jon Mini wrote:
> > John Baldwin [jhb@FreeBSD.org] wrote :
> > 
> >> jhb         2002/09/23 14:05:41 PDT
> >> 
> >>   Modified files:
> >>     sys/compat/svr4      svr4_stream.c 
> >>   Log:
> >>   Ok, make this compile for real this time.  recvfrom_args doesn't have a
> >>   fromlen member, instead it has a fromlenaddr pointer member.  Set it to
> >>   NULL.
> >>   
> >>   Revision  Changes    Path
> >>   1.34      +1 -1      src/sys/compat/svr4/svr4_stream.c
> > 
> > My apologies, John. I had thought the compat/svr4 stuff was compiled under
> > GENERIC, but apparantly not. =/
> 
> It's not. :-P  LINT is your best bet for compiling lots and lots of code.
> For svr4, there is a modules dir you can build.

That's the evil though, since it's a module it wouldn't complain
about unresolved symbols until he tried to link it.  Your first
suggestion, LINT, really is the best way to ensure the build.

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
 start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020924160830.GA95327>