From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 21 15:21:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F41A10657C1; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3857B8FC12; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:21:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7LFL1K7091302; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:21:01 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7LFL1TK091299; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:21:01 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:21:01 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Gabor Kovesdan In-Reply-To: <50334D56.6020809@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <50326A70.5020009@FreeBSD.org> <5032C4BE.5080209@FreeBSD.org> <50334D56.6020809@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:21:01 -0600 (MDT) Cc: doceng@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org, www@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CALL FOR REVIEW] doc and www converted to XML X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:21:02 -0000 On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > Em 21-08-2012 02:16, Warren Block escreveu: >> Agreed. I think the primary benefit would be taking advantage of a >> toolchain that someone else maintains. I don't know how well it would >> work for us. The nice thing is that with DocBook XML, the choice >> becomes available. > > I'm not saying either that it is useless. It can be a good source of > ideas, I just wouldn't adopt it as is. > >>> Anyway, FOP is the best free renderer out for PDF but it depends on >>> Java. Publican also uses FOP. Personally, I think we should get a >>> compromise and depend on Java or otherwise we never will have modern >>> features and outlook in our PDF documents. >> >> With OpenJDK, Java is a lot less of a hassle than previously. > > I'm not following the OpenJDK development these days. Does it require > any bootstrap JDK to build? Apparently so. The java/openjdk6 port has a build dependency on diablo-jdk16. > And once built, can we distribute it freely as a normal package? >From http://openjdk.java.net/faq/ "GPL v2 for almost all of the virtual machine, and GPL v2 + the Classpath exception for the class libraries and those parts of the virtual machine that expose public APIs."