From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 31 17:35:30 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F45216A454
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 31 May 2005 17:35:30 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sander.vesik@gmail.com)
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.199])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED6C43D1F
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 31 May 2005 17:35:28 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sander.vesik@gmail.com)
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 16so1534496nzp
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 31 May 2005 10:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=jQPKt/7PZ1QhzJQ8ZgdMmAdZ9c+9zJFYpjBpGeTvTk182OYXrNNWoIAUgglMhZs2MClvj2hTJIbfMHgdYtMJ+i6z/mu4q+rPmAX/6YmBjeOqfqIa1lZiYvvl/2g4ZT9Q3iOJVo6cS16svehsu4172DpT1sN7hR9KYfJs+PFcUhg=
Received: by 10.36.34.1 with SMTP id h1mr1918799nzh;
	Tue, 31 May 2005 10:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.34.10 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2005 10:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <dcb2c27a050531103544e443f9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 20:35:26 +0300
From: Sander Vesik <sander.vesik@gmail.com>
To: Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg <listsub@401.cx>
In-Reply-To: <4298E16B.5030403@401.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200505281540.j4SFevod017236@fire.jhs.private>
	<4298E16B.5030403@401.cx>
Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org, Daniel <bdaniel7@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Romanian BitDefender for FreeBSD Mail Servers line
X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Sander Vesik <sander.vesik@gmail.com>
List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism <freebsd-advocacy.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:35:30 -0000

On 5/29/05, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg <listsub@401.cx> wrote:
> And, if I understood it correctly, he was not requesting an
> immediate change to the webpage. He stepped up and announced a
> *will* to change it, and was asking for feedback and thoughts.
> When the community, ie advocacy@, approves of his work and agrees
> on a actual website change, then it would be time to involve the
> webmasters (they are of course welcome to join the discussion
> earlier if they so wish).
>=20

This is *UTTER* crap. he is talking about a simple issue with the web
pages and one for which channels for cahnge already exist. There is no
point in even talking about the "community" on advocacy approving
anything about the web pages before there is in fact a community on
advocacy@ and it has establshed an ability and will for looking at web
page issue. And even so, this would *NOT* fal lunder that even then.