From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 6 02:15:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD08106564A; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 02:15:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu) Received: from hergotha.csail.mit.edu (wollman-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:ccb::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95A98FC14; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 02:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hergotha.csail.mit.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hergotha.csail.mit.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q862FmdY091759; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 22:15:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by hergotha.csail.mit.edu (8.14.5/8.14.4/Submit) id q862FmCe091756; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 22:15:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20552.1876.935111.232417@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 22:15:48 -0400 From: Garrett Wollman To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" In-Reply-To: References: <20120905112013.2d44783c@laptop> <09CB99A0-75BC-426C-BD44-9ACC7CD741D1@exonetric.com> <20551.35538.119912.329917@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 22) "Instant Classic" XEmacs Lucid X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (hergotha.csail.mit.edu [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 05 Sep 2012 22:15:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hergotha.csail.mit.edu Cc: hubs@freebsd.org, Cluster Administrators Subject: Re: pkgng mirrors X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 02:15:50 -0000 < said: > I think that's again my personal summary of what I think is the satte > of affairs but again, consider it informal. But you don't really answer the question: WHO is discussing this, and WHERE? In what role are you speaking? And shouldn't the community be involved, rather than (as has happened disturbingly frequently in recent months) making a decision behind closed doors and then announcing it as a fait accompli in a post about something else? I'm all for making things better, but I don't even know what the people who are working on this (whoever they may be) are trying to accomplish. Weren't we just having a discussion on another list a month ago about how important decisions about how FreeBSD works shouldn't be made in private? -GAWollman