From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 7 18:33:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F03D16A4DD; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 18:33:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=julian=39828977f@elischer.org) Received: from a50.ironport.com (a50.ironport.com [63.251.108.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F1743DA1; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 18:33:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prvs=julian=39828977f@elischer.org) Received: from unknown (HELO [10.251.18.229]) ([10.251.18.229]) by a50.ironport.com with ESMTP; 07 Sep 2006 11:33:15 -0700 Message-ID: <450065EC.7040604@elischer.org> Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 11:33:16 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <200608281545.k7SFjn6l063922@lurza.secnetix.de> <44FF71AD.7060508@FreeBSD.org> <44FF72B9.7000201@elischer.org> <200609071057.44515.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200609071057.44515.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Peter Jeremy , Garance A Drosehn , Doug Barton Subject: Re: Attempt #3, adding a new command 'sfilter' X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 18:33:59 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: >On Wednesday 06 September 2006 21:15, Julian Elischer wrote: > > >>Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> >> >> >>>Why not just write simple 5-line script in your favorite scripting >>>language (perl, python, ruby etc) that does just this and forget about >>>it? I don't think performance is really a concern here since the most >>>time this program will spend waiting for the I/O anyway, so that doing >>>it in C makes little or no sense. >>> >>>IMHO this is one of the reasons we do have all those lightweight >>>languages around - to avoid having separate utility and/or command >>>line option for each and every particular situation. >>> >>>-Maxim >>> >>> >> >>perl is not lightweight to install on a machine. >>have you seen how much crap gets installed when you add perl? >> >>lightweight is adding 100 instructions or so to 'date'. >>or adding the strftime instruction to awk (as it is in gawk) >> >> > >Why not install the gawk port on the machines you need this on rather than >perl and use gawk then? It doesn't look to be that heavyweight of a port. > > so, instead of "add 20 lines of C and make something generally usefull, install another entire program"