From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 4 02:50:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72028FCA for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 02:50:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lidl@hydra.pix.net) Received: from hydra.pix.net (hydra.pix.net [IPv6:2001:470:e254::3c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4622C2F13 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 02:50:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hydra.pix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hydra.pix.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r942ogVf064921 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 22:50:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lidl@hydra.pix.net) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at mail.pix.net Received: (from lidl@localhost) by hydra.pix.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r942oge8064920 for freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 22:50:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lidl) Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 22:50:42 -0400 From: Kurt Lidl To: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: clang's scan-build tool? Message-ID: <20131004025042.GA64800@hydra.pix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 02:50:44 -0000 Greetings. I've been building a clang-only FreeBSD stable/9 system, as well as tracking current on another machine. On both those machines, I've got: WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS= In my src.conf file. However, I don't get the "scan-build" tool that is one of clang's tools - it doesn't look like it got imported into the contrib/llvm/clang/tools directory. Given the usefulness of this tool, is there any chance it could be included under the aegis of WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS? Thanks for your consideration. -Kurt