Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Nov 2000 12:12:37 -0800
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: "make modules" kicks the first module directory twice
Message-ID:  <20001114121237.A78808@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <200011140417.VAA37024@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 09:17:54PM -0700
References:  <3A10896D.E782256@cup.hp.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011131953001.646-100000@besplex.bde.org> <3A1030BA.D6CB42D0@cup.hp.com> <20001113144152.A39590@dragon.nuxi.com> <3A10896D.E782256@cup.hp.com> <200011140417.VAA37024@harmony.village.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 09:17:54PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> The implications are that make obj isn't done unless you've run make
> depend first.  If a new directory is added and a make depend isn't
> run, then the modules won't get built into the obj tree, but instead
> will be built into $S/modules.

Having modules wind up in two trees is not acceptable IMHO.
I'd rather take a major compile time hit and be deterministic than not.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001114121237.A78808>