Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:13:01 -0800 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: Joshua Smith <juicewvu@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1 Message-ID: <CAHu1Y73ojcVwG43zzc9bDgWiDehGiaP6ww_GDQYmXzhx_3STUA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <B62507FE-80CF-4024-9C71-699E2BA02B76@gmail.com> References: <B62507FE-80CF-4024-9C71-699E2BA02B76@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Joshua Smith <juicewvu@gmail.com> wrote: > Just curious why one would use natd instead of the in kernel nat available as either part of ipfw or pf. Kernel nat for ipfirewall requires a custom kernel (GENERIC does not have LIBALIAS). - M
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHu1Y73ojcVwG43zzc9bDgWiDehGiaP6ww_GDQYmXzhx_3STUA>