From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 31 14:21:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE0362F7 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5A118E7 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9VELXIY015527 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:21:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193588] [PATCH] Staged malo(4) firmware module Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:21:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:21:33 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193588 --- Comment #10 from John Marino --- yes, it helps. If I understand this correctly, the original port is in the link mentioned in in the description, and the attachments are patches to that link. Needless to that, that is less than optimal (read unacceptable). A new port needs to be introduced with a shar file: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html Before this port can advance, I'd like to see a completely up-to-date shar file submitted and all the other patches made obsolete. We also need poudriere logs with stage-qa checks (testport, bulk -t) as a second attachment, at the very least. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.