Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 21:07:57 -0600 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: FreeBSD questions <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: sh script problem with capturing return code Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK3xUAz_F%2Bd02Qckkgb%2Bm1bFdBVTMJ7tFp3RJ4z5e6988A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44r4ltu8zp.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <50EC9009.3030305@a1poweruser.com> <20130108224626.8c2d89cd.freebsd@edvax.de> <50EC99F2.3020404@a1poweruser.com> <44d2xevlhb.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <50ED88CF.7060308@a1poweruser.com> <448v82unxb.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <444niqum7n.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <44zk0it6t5.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <44r4ltu8zp.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Lowell Gilbert < freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> writes: > > > I think it's a real bug, and the test cases don't cover "extra" elements > > at all. Now I just have to figure out the right fix. > > I'm pretty sure that the fix is just to set rval on jumping to the > "extra" tag in vwalk() in src/usr.sbin/mtree/verify.c. > > But my hot water heater just exploded, so I may not look at code for a > few more days. I think they are importing NetBSD's updated mtree, perhaps already fixed there. -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK3xUAz_F%2Bd02Qckkgb%2Bm1bFdBVTMJ7tFp3RJ4z5e6988A>