From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 1 9: 8:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from jocke.transit.net (jocke.globalwire.se [213.136.48.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4954837B420 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 09:08:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from tjatte.globalwire.se (tjatte.globalwire.se [213.136.48.100]) by jocke.transit.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98622B834 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 18:16:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 18:02:23 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan Cars To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Two different subnets, routing. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi! I have a problem with routing issues, i wonder if this is possible. We are connected to the Internet using a gt-90 router and we have been assinged two ip-blocks. x.x.48.96/28 and x.x.49.192/27. Since the router is only going on 10mbit we would like to have all of our machines communicate directly and not through the router even if they are on different ip-blocks. In linux you can add a route saying "route add x.x.49.192/27 eth0" which makes it communicate directly on eth0 without going through the default gateway when going to that specific ip-block. Is it possible todo the same in freebsd ? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message