Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 15 Feb 2020 13:38:18 +0700
From:      Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Technological advantages over Linux
Message-ID:  <20200215063818.GE1482@admin.sibptus.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20200214204838.360c8f624397c659946bd764@sohara.org>
References:  <20200214121620.GA80657@admin.sibptus.ru> <CAEJNuHwRs=6kOK9uiFzEAqCgSgvUb8Xm5o2VWnK-ND_zseowdg@mail.gmail.com> <20200214141600.GA82559@admin.sibptus.ru> <20200214204838.360c8f624397c659946bd764@sohara.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

--ey/N+yb7u/X9mFhi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:16:00 +0700
> Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> wrote:
>=20
> > For example, the absence of Docker (or analogous technology) for FreeBSD
> > is a huge disadvantage. We need to name really superiour features to
> > make up for this shortage.
>=20
> 	pkg search docker shows a lot of packages including:
>=20
> docker-18.09.5_1               Open-source application container engine
> docker-compose-1.24.0_1        Define and run multi-container applications
> with Docker
>=20
> 	Looks like we have docker=20

I was speaking of sysutils/docker-freebsd which remained BROKEN for
years and was eventually removed from the ports tree. I'll certainly
look at sysutils/docker and sysutils/docker-compose, thanks for the
hint. I hope it is THE docker (/me is starting poudriere...)

> - but IMHO jails are better lightweight
> containers with a *much* longer track record=20


But jails lack a repository of ready-made containers with applications.
To be honest, jails lack even a decent management infrastructure. Yes we
have bits like "pkg -j", "bectl jail", "bsdinstall jail",
"freebsd-update -b"  but nobody cared to build a convenient
infrastructure out of all this, not to speak about a repository of
ready-made jails for different purposes.

> and there's bhyve for full
> blown virtualisation.

bhyve is great, that's true. If it could also run Windows guests on
paravirtualized disks (not emulated SATA), I'd be completely happy.


--=20
Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

--ey/N+yb7u/X9mFhi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJeR5HaAAoJEA2k8lmbXsY0/wYH/AvLbzR76bgNoa8Lm1/yMkdz
mq9KdE70Uj5NURCcLO5ANKuExWBPvK0Ali6HulRU1W7iR6sYxcBTTZWQD8ieX6ch
r7t6w34wNNfsK0tXcAm3yXNqr8Z52UMUPgZuFxgDgckBn0e6gUWYrxVA8vTlILTa
dzV8/7gHogpebuHqXf0ifeF8lZd0vXTVlvh0ysUOZjFcOrmxZoZc8Hllt9pOLlOF
RqxRjvJDs3djboSWfVyFPZjIRDbqseprXRtKT+EoQ5DhTqUArXFIH23sKYmKHnh5
KPZaRDVN9IMYGhnM69qoKArgSNpOzObZlIVZ6Pur5JNj6VLbbw8xJGq3xKsRjw4=
=Qr1X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ey/N+yb7u/X9mFhi--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200215063818.GE1482>