From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Apr 6 09:53:00 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA12877 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 09:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dg-rtp.dg.com (dg-rtp.rtp.dg.com [128.222.1.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA12845 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 09:52:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by dg-rtp.dg.com (5.4R3.10/dg-rtp-v02) id AA03820; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 12:50:03 -0400 Received: from ponds by dg-rtp.dg.com.rtp.dg.com; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 12:50 EDT Received: from lakes.water.net (lakes [10.0.0.3]) by ponds.water.net (8.8.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA27267; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 11:54:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.water.net (8.8.3/8.6.9) id MAA22131; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 12:00:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 1997 12:00:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199704061600.MAA22131@lakes.water.net> To: ponds!suburbia.net!proff, ponds!squirrel.tgsoft.com!thompson Subject: Re: sendmail in 2.2 Cc: ponds!freefall.freebsd.org!hackers Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > From: proff@suburbia.net > Date: Sun, 6 Apr 1997 19:43:16 +1000 (EST) > > My gee-whiz qmail auto-everything port has been in > ftp.FreeBSD.org:/pub/FreeBSD/incoming for a while now (hint); > > Cheers, > Julian. > > Are we ready for religious wars? I certainly think that qmail should be > an optional MTA for freebsd (if it can't be the default). Admittedly, > you have to do things 'differently' with qmail, but arguably, the > 'different' way is the way it should always have been. > > Let the people decide! If the port already exists, why isn't it in there? > > -mark > Ok - I'm ready to be convinced (I've hacked on sendmail enough to think "there's got to be an easier way.") I've got several machines all networked together on a private network; mail goes out/comes in on one of the machines via a UUCP connection. Each user has a .forward which sends the mail to their own machine (a reasonable approach on a small network.) Also, there are two Win/95 machines I'd like to add to this... Can qmail handle it, and, if so, how do I set it up? - Dave Rivers -