Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 20:14:45 +0400 (MSD) From: bag@sinbin.demos.su (Alex G. Bulushev) To: tom@inna.net (Thomas Arnold) Cc: michaelv@mindbender.serv.net, drussell@saturn-tech.com, chuckr@glue.umd.edu, steve@visint.co.uk, dave@persprog.com, hardware@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Pentuim or Pentuim Pro ? Message-ID: <199704171614.UAA06496@sinbin.demos.su> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970417115214.25402B-100000@caught.inna.net> from "Thomas Arnold" at Apr 17, 97 11:59:04 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > That's nice, but can you post a competative comparison against > > something else? The stats do nothing for me all by themselves. > > Thanks. > > Chips I have on hand : K5-133, K6-166, Cyrix 6x86-166. I will re-bench > all of them on the same board. > > If you have benchmarks other then Nsieve and FLOPS you'd like to see run > I'll run them too. I expect to be able to do this tonight. it is also interesting to run bytebench (we have a colection of bytebench results for different platforms and cpu's) Alex. > > +-----------------------------------------------+ > : Tom Arnold - No relation to Rosanne : > : SysAdmin/Pres - TBI, Ltd ( inna.net ) : > : The Middle Peninsula's Internet Connection : > +-----------------------------------------------+ > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704171614.UAA06496>