From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Aug 10 0:40: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D07337B8FE for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:40:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id AAA52822; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:40:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200008100740.AAA52822@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: bin/20445: restore(8) -r and -R don't use mktemp(3) Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/20445; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sheldon Hearn To: Jon Masami Kuroda Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/20445: restore(8) -r and -R don't use mktemp(3) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 09:32:37 +0200 On Tue, 08 Aug 2000 11:01:10 MST, Jon Masami Kuroda wrote: > Now this makes sense. It's still annoying, but it makes sense. Perhaps > restore(8) needs a flag to say "screw this, use mkstemp!" if the operator > so desires. Or a way to save the names of the files for later use. I can't think of an elegant solution. I think we're approaching the limits of the software, beyond which we'd stub our toes trying to make it all things to all men. I'd like to close the PR, but if you have any great ideas that you think we won't stub our toes on, I'll leave it open. What say you? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message