From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 20 19:19:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6161065676 for ; Sun, 20 May 2012 19:19:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0AF48FC1A for ; Sun, 20 May 2012 19:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903A4D23CDA for ; Sun, 20 May 2012 15:19:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 122CCD23C1D for ; Sun, 20 May 2012 15:19:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FB943B0.6040501@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 15:19:12 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <4FB8E67C.5030001@FreeBSD.org> <4FB90160.9060002@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4FB9437D.5050804@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FB9437D.5050804@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: PORTVERSION=1.0.0b X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 19:19:06 -0000 On 5/20/12 3:18 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > Try setting DISTVERSION=1.0.0b and let the ports generate PORTVERSION > make -V PORTVERSION > 1.0.0.b > > ok, like that? > any porters handbook, committers habndbook documentation on that? as in why '1.0.0.b' is preferred over '1.0.0b'? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell