Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 01:25:21 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Dave Walton <dwalton@psiint.com> Cc: Samy Touati <lmcsato@lmc.ericsson.se>, Brian Litzinger <brian@MediaCity.Com>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BitsurfrPro on FBSD 2.1 & MLPPP broken Message-ID: <28274.828091521@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 28 Mar 1996 14:49:24 PST." <Pine.A32.3.91.960328141129.43928F-100000@vv.psiint.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> insistence that this is purely a hardware problem. The second half of > his sentence above (which you didn't quote) points out that the same > hardware works correctly under Win95. I'm not suggesting that it's > entirely FreeBSD's problem, since other TA's work correctly. I'm just > surprised at the attitude that it's all Motorola's fault. Win95 > demonstrates that it IS possible for the hardware to work correctly. I'm not saying it's all Moto's fault, I'm simply saying that I've had no problems whatsoever with a pair of ADTRAN TAs for the last 6 months and would like a "second opinion" on those Motos. The fact that it works under Win95 doesn't necessarily mean that Windows is stressing those TAs fully. I know that FreeBSD pushes mine to the theoretical max, so... Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28274.828091521>