Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:05:27 -0500
From:      Ryan Coleman <editor@d3photography.com>
To:        Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Tools to find "unlegal" files ( videos , music etc )
Message-ID:  <E5F8B6EB-C059-4F4D-87E2-EFE4B300983F@d3photography.com>
In-Reply-To: <201107190323.p6J3NSHM028311@mail.r-bonomi.com>
References:  <201107190323.p6J3NSHM028311@mail.r-bonomi.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

On Jul 18, 2011, at 10:23 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:

>=20
>> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 23:01:53 -0700
>> From: perryh@pluto.rain.com
>> Subject: Re: Tools to find "unlegal" files ( videos , music etc )
>>=20
>> Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
>>=20
>> <snip specific suggestions re awk(1), file(1), find(1), grep(1), =
etc.>
>>=20
>> All well and good for locating files of a certain format and/or
>> with particular content, but it doesn't address the question of
>> whether a specific copy is "legal", i.e. did the user who put it
>> there have the legal right to put it there?
>=20
> {{ Noting that the troll contributed nothing constructive to the OP's
>   problem, _or_ to dealing with the pseudo-issue he raises. }}
>=20
> Obviously the ankle-biter was incapable of reading the ACTUAL REQUEST
> the OP made:
>=20
>  "Anyone knows an utility that I could pipe to the "find" command
>   in order to detect video, music, games ... etc  files ?
>=20
>   I need a tool that could "inspect" inside files because many users
>   rename those filename to "inoffensive" ones :-)"
>=20
> NOTE WELL that the OP was _smart_enough_ -- unlike the prior poster -- =
to
> ask about something that _can_ be done mechanically.
>=20
> Furthermore, it was _explicit_ in the actual suggestion that it only=20=

> produced a list possible 'suspects' -- It did _not_ provide any =
indication=20
> of status -- 'legal', or otherwise.

Go to hell. He wants to rename the files that are illegal to ones that =
aren't. That's circumventing copyright law and would land him or her in =
jail. This topic, based solely on ethics, should not be discussed as any =
suggestions that this is LEGAL to do supports copyright violations.

I would record those names and DELETE them but only if the TOS supports =
it. If it does not, then you get the DCMA notice and handle it =
accordingly from the copyright holder.

-r-=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E5F8B6EB-C059-4F4D-87E2-EFE4B300983F>