Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 09:44:07 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, Josef Karthauser <joe@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT cfg.pm Message-ID: <20010523094407.B74488@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010522165405.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Tue, May 22, 2001 at 04:54:05PM -0700 References: <20010522233911.4E1013E2C@bazooka.unixfreak.org> <XFMail.010522165405.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 04:54:05PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 22-May-01 Dima Dorfman wrote: > > Josef Karthauser <joe@FreeBSD.org> writes: > >> joe 2001/05/22 16:18:11 PDT > >> > >> Modified files: > >> . cfg.pm > >> Log: > >> Revert to the previous behaviour of not sending mail on directory > >> creation. > >> > >> Note to FreeBSD committers: do we want this on? > > > > I don't think it's a very good idea. Think of ports. People already > > don't like that there are two commits for every new port (the port > > itself and CVSROOT/modules); this would raise that number to three or > > four (the dir(s) for the port, the port, and modules). > > What if it was just for the other trees then and not ports? > I'm with John here. -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010523094407.B74488>