Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:21:04 -0700 (MST)
From:      "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com>
To:        didier@omnix.net (Didier Derny)
Cc:        jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, cracauer@cons.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Let 3.x die ASAP?
Message-ID:  <200003291821.LAA16584@freeway.dcfinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1000329145706.13503A-100000@omnix.net> from Didier Derny at "Mar 29, 0 03:14:04 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As I recall, Didier Derny wrote:
> I can't an many people can't upgrade the system on their machine
> at the actual rythm of FreeBSD version (each one supposed to be the best
> one and solve most of the problems :-))) )
> without a real stability (like the one with 2.x) this product
> has no more value than linux or solaris, sco...

So, is there some feature in the 3.x line that isn't in 2.2.x that
you can't live without?  If not, your course is clear.  Put up a
2.2-STABLE system and quit worrying about stability.


	-crl
--
Chad R. Larson (CRL15)   602-953-1392   Brother, can you paradigm?
chad@dcfinc.com         chad@larsons.org          larson1@home.net   
DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003291821.LAA16584>