Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:03:50 -0400 From: Michael Edenfield <kutulu@kutulu.org> To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin Makefile src/lib Makefile src/sbin Makefile src/usr.bin Makefile src/usr.sbin Makefile Message-ID: <20030829200349.GA86217@wombat.localnet> In-Reply-To: <20030829194007.GA69823@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200308291035.h7TAZ1Wm008611@repoman.freebsd.org> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030829090446.44583A-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20030829183759.GA68755@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030829121043.K43708@root.org> <20030829194007.GA69823@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> [030829 15:36]: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:14:17PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, David O'Brien wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:08:35AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > > > > > > > NO_TOOLCHAIN skips Compilers and Binutils > > > > > NO_USB skips USB stuff > > > > > NO_VINUM skips Vinum stuff > > > > > NO_ACPI skips ACPI stuff > > > > > > > > Great! I was hoping this would be the outcome of the Minimalist Fr= eeBSD > > > > discussion. > > > > > > Was there a discussion somewhere that most of us missed? > >=20 > > Hmm, missed it also. In general I'm in favor of this but would prefer = to > > see these also defined under a single knob (MINIMAL?). >=20 > I disagree that it should be a single (MINIMAL(sp?)) knob. But that > there should be more discussion about it. If you have NO_TOOLCHAIN set, > I can't think of a reason to have /usr/include or /usr/lib/*.a populated; > for instance. If you don't have a compiler or binutils toolchain installed, then make buildworld isn't going to make it very far in general :) But I also disagree with lumping it all together. I'm not sure how long Vinum and ACPI specifically take to build on my lower-end hardware, but the full buildworld/buildkernel takes nearly an entire day, and that's already with most of the NO_ flags (no profiling, no sendmail, no i4b, no uucp) . So any bit I can get helps :) --Mike --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/T7GlCczNhKRsh48RArEdAKCUxpXgFiwYHiUzYLXEyhNum+KNmACdEyCS F1HYAIztguC9H76kNPJiKg0= =MGI2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030829200349.GA86217>