Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:18:59 +0200
From:      Vladislav Prodan <universite@ukr.net>
To:        Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re[2]: Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1
Message-ID:  <1391033938.846207368.s17yjvjq@frv35.ukr.net>
In-Reply-To: <52E9762F.10208@fjl.co.uk>
References:  <1390999493.115887823.pfbg2ep5@frv35.ukr.net> <52E91B3D.4000601@fjl.co.uk> <1391010653.726619904.szvwo6t9@frv35.ukr.net> <52E9762F.10208@fjl.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help




> On 29/01/2014 15:52, Vladislav Prodan wrote:
> > 
> >
> >
> >> On 29/01/2014 12:45, Vladislav Prodan wrote:
> >>> Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1
> >>>
> >>> 10.1.2.3 -> 100.1.2.3
> >>> 10.1.2.4 -> 100.1.2.4
> >>> 10.1.2.5 -> 100.1.2.5
> >>> 10.1.2.6 -> 100.1.2.6
> >>> ...
> >>> IP addresses such an over 20k
> >>> prompt you implement?
> >>>
> >> I don't understand the question exactly (I expect I will not be the only
> >> one). natd will allow 1:1 mappings like this very easily. Are you saying
> >> you have a lot of these and you do not want to write the config file by
> >> hand?
> >>
> >>
> > I'm not sure that FreeBSD withstand an over 20k rules of the form:
> >
> > ipfw nat 3 config ip 100.1.2.3
> > ipfw nat 4 config ip 100.1.2.4
> > ipfw nat 5 config ip 100.1.2.5
> > ipfw nat 6 config ip 100.1.2.6
> > ...
> >
> > + Two rules to handle each nat N
> >
> > Probably need to somehow use nat tablearg, but I do not understand logic.
> >
> >
> 
> I do not think there would be a problem with natd. It uses libalias and 
> this calls malloc() to add each redirect to a simple linked list. A 
> quick looks suggests it's only 50-ish bytes/entry (depending on 
> processor) so a table of 20K of them would be ~1Mb (+malloc overhead). 
> There was a time when 1Mb was a lot of core, but not any more. It may 
> slow down a bit, as it links through he list.
> 
> There might be something in the newer libalias that does it more 
> efficiently, but if you give it a go I think it will probably work.
> 
> Regards, Frank.
> 
>

Thank you for your feedback. 
I will try to assemble the stand and test scripts to simulate the behavior of users.

-- 
Vladislav V. Prodan 
System & Network Administrator 
http://support.od.ua 
+380 67 4584408, +380 99 4060508
VVP88-RIPE
 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1391033938.846207368.s17yjvjq>