Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:27:10 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Andrej Zverev <az@freebsd.org> Cc: "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r344316 - in head/net-mgmt: . p5-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk p5-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk/files Message-ID: <20140304112710.GA63353@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAD5bB%2BiER-D3DzbwwDa_MASmhX75v=9B0VG_=MPNL%2BFWAmD3Rw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAD5bB%2BiER-D3DzbwwDa_MASmhX75v=9B0VG_=MPNL%2BFWAmD3Rw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:04:39AM +0400, Andrej Zverev wrote: > > Submitted by: Andrew Thompson <thompsa@freebsd.org> > > +MAINTAINER= perl@FreeBSD.org > > I know this is old rule, but we don't like such practice (and i think > we still) when maintainer != submitter for a new port. I recall the rule was about that newly added ports should not be maintained by ports@. Meta-entities like x11@, perl@, python@, etc. make sense, and I don't see a problem here (if a port in question is ineeded of such a broad interest and/or importance). ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140304112710.GA63353>