Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 02:56:30 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro> To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 5.2 where is /kernel.GENERIC Message-ID: <20031230025630.5461e7c2@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> In-Reply-To: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGCEGIFCAA.fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com> References: <Pine.HPX.4.44.0312291512180.15239-100000@hills.ccsf.cc.ca.us> <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGCEGIFCAA.fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:31:27 -0500 "fbsd_user" <fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com> wrote: > There is no kernel in the boot directory on my 5.2 RC2 system. There > is an boot sub-directory named kernel that contains 150 files, one > of them being kernel that's around the correct size to be the > GENERIC binary kernel. AFAIK this is all documented in the release notes of 5.x and/or UPDATING. > Are you telling me that the kernel binary is moved from an easy > uncluttered location in 4.9 of / to a location 2 directory levels > deep Aha. > and surrounded with a bunch of clutter? Really ? > What king of stupid system design decision is that? Why is it so stupid ? > Is it possible this is an mistake? Nop. > Should an problem report be make to point this error out the 5.2 > release team? No, IMHO. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031230025630.5461e7c2>