From owner-freebsd-bugs  Fri Jun  8  2:30:13 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399CA37B401
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Fri,  8 Jun 2001 02:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f589U2W41036;
	Fri, 8 Jun 2001 02:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 02:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200106080930.f589U2W41036@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: "Vladimir B. Grebenschikov" <vova@express.ru>
Subject: Re: bin/14175: route for ip aliasing
Reply-To: "Vladimir B. Grebenschikov" <vova@express.ru>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-bugs.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR bin/14175; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Vladimir B. Grebenschikov" <vova@express.ru>
To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: "Vladimir B. Grebenschikov" <vova@express.ru>,
	freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, jch@oleane.net
Subject: Re: bin/14175: route for ip aliasing
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:23:58 +0400 (MSD)

 Ruslan Ermilov writes:
  > Thanks for reminding!
  > Fixed in route.c,v 1.46 and route.8,v 1.24.
  
 May be allow similar semantic in ifconfig too ?
 
 ifconfig if0 192.168.1.1/28 
 instead of
 ifconfig if0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.240 
 ? 
 
  > On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 06:23:31PM +0400, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
  > > ru@FreeBSD.ORG writes:
  > >  > Synopsis: route for ip aliasing
  > >  > 
  > >  > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
  > >  > State-Changed-By: ru
  > >  > State-Changed-When: Thu Jun 7 07:00:15 PDT 2001
  > >  > State-Changed-Why: 
  > >  > Asked and answered.
  > > 
  > > Actual I think not good idea support different address schemes for
  > > netstat -r and route(8) utilites:
  > > 
  > > # route add 10.0.0.0/16 192.168.14.1
  > > add net 10.0.0.0: gateway 192.168.14.1
  > > # netstat -rn | egrep \^10
  > > 10/16              192.168.14.1       UGSc        0        0     fxp0
  > > # route delete 10/16
  > > route: writing to routing socket: No such process
  > > delete net 10: not in table
  > > # route delete 10.0.0.0/16
  > > delete net 10.0.0.0
  > > #
  > > 
  > > if netstat deal with addreses like 10/16, I think route need to deal
  > > with them too.
  > > 
  > > --
  > > TSB Russian Express, Moscow
  > > Vladimir B. Grebenschikov, vova@express.ru
  > 
  > -- 
  > Ruslan Ermilov		Oracle Developer/DBA,
  > ru@sunbay.com		Sunbay Software AG,
  > ru@FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer,
  > +380.652.512.251	Simferopol, Ukraine
  > 
  > http://www.FreeBSD.org	The Power To Serve
  > http://www.oracle.com	Enabling The Information Age
  > 
 
 --
 TSB Russian Express, Moscow
 Vladimir B. Grebenschikov, vova@express.ru

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message