Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 09:51:11 +0100 From: Ruben van Staveren <ruben@verweg.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INET6 -- and why I don't use it Message-ID: <CECD0714-5625-49A6-BC2A-0DEF0AB56A98@verweg.com> In-Reply-To: <20080306061339.3CE2C4500E@ptavv.es.net> References: <20080306061339.3CE2C4500E@ptavv.es.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-19-1000488860 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The interesting thing, to stay on topic, is that people are willing to explore a feature called "SCTP" which to my knowledge is younger than "IPv6". This makes the whole discussion sort of moot, right ? Speaking for the devil's advocate... The point of insecurity does not hold up if you look at RFC 5062. And we had TCP/UDP for many years and they are still serving their purpose well, so why change ? So give it a chance, only then there will be feedback and only then we can fix the problems. Otherwise it will stay just theoretical. - Ruben --Apple-Mail-19-1000488860 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) iD8DBQFHz7CAZ88+mcQxRw0RAgnZAJ4khFJfySNMFQy/j55N8zi0Y5M6xgCdFX8d YdY39I7oCFzLugsSuHrif9Y= =c/3L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-19-1000488860--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CECD0714-5625-49A6-BC2A-0DEF0AB56A98>