From owner-freebsd-chat  Thu Mar 25  9:13:37 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from geek.grf.ov.com (geek.grf.ov.com [192.251.86.19])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 67D4814E50; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:13:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ksmm@threespace.com)
Received: from pebbles (pebbles.cam.veritas.com [166.98.49.16])
	by geek.grf.ov.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id MAA17828;
	Thu, 25 Mar 1999 12:13:10 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199903251713.MAA17828@geek.grf.ov.com>
X-Sender: ksmm@mail.cybercom.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 12:12:35 -0500
To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
From: The Classiest Man Alive <ksmm@threespace.com>
Subject: Linux vs. FreeBSD: The Storage Wars
Cc: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Feature for feature, is there a big difference in the storage requirements
of Linux and FreeBSD?  That is, would a FreeBSD installation (say 2.2.8)
take any more or less space than a comparably configured Linux installation?

Thanks in advance for your insight.

K.S.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message