From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jun 11 05:06:36 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB61134AE4C for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 05:06:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49jBfM3wpJz43pc for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 05:06:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([94.222.24.162]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue012 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1MeDYt-1jBHup0Trz-00bN2T for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 07:06:32 +0200 Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 07:06:30 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd vs. netbsd Message-Id: <20200611070630.2cb42786.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <250b853a-b436-0e99-b05c-9abd6b6019ef@panix.com> References: <171506d5-19aa-359e-c21d-f07257c52ebd@freenetMail.de> <62d10000-e068-922e-23bd-f7a61e7a4e89@anatoli.ws> <6a4f6a15-ec43-03f6-1a41-a109e445f026@anatoli.ws> <00225a04-237d-9051-9aea-12c192106a20@anatoli.ws> <373EDB20-C750-42E2-A41B-EA61F6E49807@kicp.uchicago.edu> <20200609120136.00005b3c@seibercom.net> <2393a1e0-b073-950a-78be-9f57d8e9934b@anatoli.ws> <20200610063555.00003707@seibercom.net> <82F57D0D-E0EC-49F7-824E-20A296C9F549@kicp.uchicago.edu> <250b853a-b436-0e99-b05c-9abd6b6019ef@panix.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:UZFl+L4f/V/KaNWRd7t7aynyewmg35nYgq45cxY+59Y6f/QzFZp f+78LYRBS3Nj++iF6oog50+WzvGFTmyQRhq3driBAmLq12ZG2YgG7sJaULrqxdxAtiHpna9 sEwV5tzsWgOLbzbsN0f+PbumxmXRzvZDHNEBakFf0xAA+2MTn66XvTjiAigHEUYnMDqgfNr TBzvHjDNg1wiVxaZkfEtQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:PwdKSCdse8M=:I8WrQfxRuwxwT1ZbOtCgau 2EmV0TDtp+c0yNtLLIAiAiy6OQ80VxDbD1YArVShK5rUaSy5lvgpEaWa/JRt/36kWSe2W1ojg JSS+1nLrrng3l5yaMwNN+k/XJpHmrtZ2JAosbiq2QmuxrTSzPcLTV5Vm5SGKmgJFX5qsdkj5o KqZrUnnA6IEPhD7aQsbwAxUHFT3oadgiieJFrw+VJGn30Hft+2NCgn0U6NCEN/fxWhf8LBVwJ k7V3ENZImRXHA3ZzirFEHPtzvdpflpiB6TOugZISBABYeu2rUbuGAnCpC2u3jQIeI6Xe3CS2I jctAYhOUwEFS75Txeogqz2EpDbgqD8sp9nOFVSd4cYdiTAPpoWTJEcXiyIVi0SQ2NHV/lP35Y RbsBiPPh6lZlRf+/g1uLsuDh3xqdoT8P4qWapgQ+CkwgrrpNfehCQaPalVWWDWcgDlkgIxV06 BndXM9vbiMtB/7Zy5h/pSSzQwWhisecD+jOxstAxE6ynkxc1MKIQhtSuPalrUDkrUbNbf+SJ8 8rSwd77G75wbSCygA4UE56SmhVqHCZf3EQzrLME76IWv5kMDy6/OhPwkIVYyqaINAHbj8PHsV yHWnnUScel3Exn5MzU2J4ue9IlMjEsPAxZtalvjBtOx3trOAjocJgHhpEuWmp91soD16I5VTG d0tiCfb3c5K8gnXs/233MU126bG/bbfbNNrA5l6C9v/H+0717hlvHCW6K30C44NRpb/llxElV KcFvH/gs9ohISMlfmDc7Hb3VSc7NKpRx9e35raNNVgsNhh9Ta77vdIyAR6q31mLK6e6ZbHtGs xtt+Y5njMMSH1z73PVMFE/dQ8IqKwmJpwWjBDzoqAC8WSgdaGOYpgube51F9LZ8l/jI5Bjh X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49jBfM3wpJz43pc X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@edvax.de has no SPF policy when checking 212.227.126.131) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@edvax.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.09 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[94.222.24.162:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.17)[0.174]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.67)[0.667]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.85)[0.847]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[212.227.126.131:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[212.227.126.131:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 05:06:36 -0000 On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:24:15 -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote: > Some mail readers know about mailing lists, recognize messages from > them, and offer to "reply to list". This isn't even a new feature: my old version of Sylpheed supports "reply", "reply to sender", "reply to mailing list" and "reply to all"; as long as the relevant message headers are intact, this should work as expected. However, I assume that the use of "reply to all" is so convenient it is often preferred to "reply to mailing list", that's why sometimes replies are send "twice"... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...