From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 12 13:06:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12435302 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:06:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f171.google.com (mail-lb0-f171.google.com [209.85.217.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A6A3D34 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 10so860994lbg.16 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 06:06:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zS1V+rQp7w6TkwgG2Q0tuMl12hgSoL96/Zvmur4L3lA=; b=M7jyJNKgqhGeENtmaIVagKKbkcxUAe3pFaNHJc1mkgiPKR+grMSLbZ8YXGdfNJmc7b O8+zGz1QkODDJBdynn92E8lPcDk9X5tGblw9AUQ7WyZmWqT2xXo0Va74NuqoE2pvUQFJ Z/j/m8j9NRcHvorTNN2h+Eb9UR+s4aO9DoIzrweD0o+k6A35V6pngUljUJ5zFhfO4T19 K0S/NPaGt0wsVNCxCvDLzyR5oan6tinC+DwnRMahUjjIuzgWXTL73cPY5boHRtBz3a8g 1Cbj3WW15DheUccj3xYGuXotZkWbip5vZNS1F68SYEni1eWWV1TqTWCHk3YGpDMUZae/ /8Kw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnepl9grlEzFzo/R/0ySxtizWu8g3Y4jzotJMbLlzbs45zZgHN559x+SGl8ORHhpNywUutp X-Received: by 10.112.24.104 with SMTP id t8mr8609035lbf.46.1410527215046; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 06:06:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([89.169.173.68]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id as5sm1250141lac.46.2014.09.12.06.06.53 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 06:06:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5412EFED.9000100@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 17:06:53 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerald Pfeifer Subject: Re: Can't build lang/gcc port on i386: segmentation fault References: <5412D743.70005@freebsd.org> <5412E4A1.7040101@freebsd.org> <5412E64E.7050701@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:06:58 -0000 On 12.09.2014 16:42, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Andrey Chernov wrote: >>> As I just found, it builds with BOOTSTRAP nice, so apparently clang >>> makes some damage. You can see CFLAGS in the log. Swap is 4GB I think it >>> is large enough. Nothing special otherwise. >> BTW, previous 4.7* as lang/gcc build fine even without BOOTSTRAP. > > I am curious, what happens when you try lang/gcc48? > > My expectation would be both lang/gcc and lang/gcc48 to behave > the same, since it's a very similar codebase, gcc48 just a bit > newer on the same branch. > > We could make BOOTSTRAP the default for lang/gcc, though not > doing that and thus building a lot faster has been one of the > features of lang/gcc. -- Since it does not reproduce for me, > do others see the same failure? Segfault is exact the same but comes from strange place - in the middle of configure check. I will try with MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes -- http://ache.vniz.net/