Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Mar 1998 11:39:59 -0800
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
To:        Scot Elliott <scot@tweetie.online.barbour-index.co.uk>
Cc:        stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD can't find 32M of my 48M without help 
Message-ID:  <29268.890595599@time.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 22 Mar 1998 19:34:12 GMT." <Pine.BSF.3.96.980322192953.372A-100000@tweetie> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sun, 22 Mar 1998, Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/extended software support wrote:
> 
> > I didn't think the MAXMEM was required for under 64M.
> > 
> > Machine is a Compaq P/166.
> >
> > [ and other stuff ] 
> 
> All my machines with more than 64M (some 128M and 96M machines) report the
> correct amount of RAM when they boot.  Does this mean they're actually

Which is what's supposed to happen.  I find Drew's report almost
inexplicable and quite disturbing - I'd thought that our memory sizing
problems were things of the past.

> So is it OK at the minute or should I tell it how much its got?

If the size reported is OK, you're OK.

						Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?29268.890595599>