Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 02:53:43 -0800 (PST) From: Brian Litzinger <brian@MediaCity.com> To: dwalton@psiint.com (Dave Walton) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, lmcsato@lmc.ericsson.se, questions@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BitsurfrPro on FBSD 2.1 & MLPPP broken Message-ID: <199603291053.CAA19411@MediaCity.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.A32.3.91.960328141129.43928F-100000@vv.psiint.com> from Dave Walton at "Mar 28, 96 02:49:24 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dave Walton wrote: > On Thu, 28 Mar 1996, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > > After this result I'm starting to suspect freebsd as being the problem, > [* especially after I gave it a try with win 95 and the modem didn't resets > [* itself. > > > I wouldn't, at least not yet - try another brand; who's to say that Moto > > *fixed* the problem? > > I don't mean to be a pain here, but I really don't understand the > insistence that this is purely a hardware problem. The second half of > his sentence above (which you didn't quote) points out that the same > hardware works correctly under Win95. I'm not suggesting that it's > entirely FreeBSD's problem, since other TA's work correctly. I'm just > surprised at the attitude that it's all Motorola's fault. Win95 > demonstrates that it IS possible for the hardware to work correctly. It's all motorola's fault. I spend much of my life testing all sorts of HICAP solutions on all sorts of platforms. Brian Litzinger brian@mediacity.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603291053.CAA19411>