Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 7 Dec 2013 15:02:55 +0100
From:      Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To:        "Thomas Mueller" <mueller6724@bellsouth.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Equivalence to cp -Ru : update
Message-ID:  <20131207150255.0faaa4d5.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <67426.70063.bm@smtp116.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References:  <20131206195618.899fe8b4e89177f1bd331344@gmail.com> <20131206222407.8468245b.freebsd@edvax.de> <67426.70063.bm@smtp116.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 12:10:27 +0000 (UTC), Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I find cpdup in FreeBSD ports but not NetBSD pkgsrc.
> 
> I just found a reason why rsync might be preferable, just in the
> past few hours, [...]

It's no problem to prefer rsync over cpdup; rsync is much
more portable (present on _many_ systems), so if you're
searching for a method to achieve the same result by
applying the same command on different systems, go with
rsync. If you're just searching for a --update equivalent
for Linux's cp, you can use cpdup _on FreeBSD_, as it is
a very good program and can be used to construct many
kinds of backup solutions. But as I said, rsync also can
do this. :-)



-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131207150255.0faaa4d5.freebsd>